Harrison
Harrison v. Willoughby
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 KYLE ROGER HARRISON, Case No.: 24-cv-2369-BEN Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
16 FLOYD M. WILLOUGHBY, et al., AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a proposed Complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), rather than paying the regular filing fee as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to prepay the entire fee only if the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). This Court finds Plaintiff’s affidavit of no assets is sufficient to show he is unable to pay the fees or post securities required to maintain this action. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP. Sua Sponte Screening per…