San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20255:20-cv-00824California956 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, Case No. 5:20-cv-00824-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE

AMICUS BRIEF

v.

CITY OF SUNNYVALE, et al., Re: ECF No. 281 Defendants.

In this water quality case, Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper alleges that the Cities of Sunnyvale and Mountain View have violated certain terms in the permits that regulate the Cities’ wastewater discharges. The Cities have filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s prior rulings in this case based on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City and County of San Francisco v. EPA (“CCSF”), 145 S. Ct. 704 (2025). According to the Cities, this recent decision shows that certain of the permit terms they are alleged to have violated are invalid. Two California water agencies (Proposed Amici)1 have moved for leave to file an amicus brief on the reconsideration motion. ECF No. 281. Defendants oppose. ECF No. 292. Having reviewed the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.