Macomber
(PC) Cramer v. Macomber
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MATTHEW B. CRAMER, No. 1:25-cv-00489-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT
v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION JEFF MACOMBER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING MOTION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED Defendants. (ECF No. 2) 15 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis on April 21, 2025, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On April 28, 2025, the action was transferred to this Court. (ECF No. 4.) For the reasons explained below, Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied because he has had at least three actions or appeals dismissed as strikes and the allegations do not 23 …