Brar
Brar v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANBEER SINGH BRAR, Case No. 1:25-cv-00503-JLT-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQURING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT
v. BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT
MATTER JURISDICTION
APPLE, INC., (Doc. 1) Defendant. 21-DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Tanbeer Singh Brar initiated this action with the filing of a complaint against Defendant Apple, Inc., on April 30, 2025. (Doc. 1). Background The Court has a duty to consider its own subject matter jurisdiction, regardless of whether the issue is raised by the parties, and is required to dismiss an action over which it lacks jurisdiction. See Morongo Bank of Mission Indians v. Cal. State Bd. of Equalization, 858 F.2d 1376, 1380 (9th Cir. 1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff’s allegations are difficult to follow but he appears to assert “conversion, modifications and changing in functionality of computer language programming of the products of…