Jones

Jones v. Oceanside Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20253:25-cv-01089California1,438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYNE ELIJAH JONES, Case No.: 25-cv-1089-BAS-JLB

CDCR #BU-7712,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT 14 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

OCEANSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

(ECF No. 2) VISTA SUPERIOR COURT,

Defendants. 18 19 Wayne Elijah Jones (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing. He has instead filed a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement, which this Court liberally construes as a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) REQUEST TO PROCEED IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.