In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20253:22-cv-03580California2,015 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE Case No. 22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)

LITIGATION

REDACTED This Document Relates To: ORDER RE APRIL 25, 2025 All Actions. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE REVENUE FROM NON-HEALTHCARE

PROVIDERS

11 Re: Dkt. No. 991

12 The parties ask the Court to resolve their dispute regarding whether Meta should be required to answer an interrogatory and to produce documents regarding advertising revenue Meta received from “non-Healthcare Providers.” Dkt. No. 991. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court orders Meta to provide a further answer to Interrogatory No. 18 and to produce documents responsive to RFPs 283 and 287, consistent with the direction provided in this order. The Court orders further proceedings re RFPs 284-286. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs seek an order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.