Theodore

Theodore v. American Express National Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20253:23-cv-03710California2,122 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DIANA THEODORE, Case No. 23-cv-03710-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, Re: Dkt. No. 61 11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Diana Theodore brings this putative class action against Defendant American Express National Bank alleging violations of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq. On April 4, 2024, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and dismissed the case without prejudice. See ECF 45. Plaintiff subsequently appealed the dismissal to the Ninth Circuit. ECF 46. While the case was pending before the court of appeals, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Smith v. Spizzirri, holding “[w]hen a district court finds that a lawsuit involves an arbitrable dispute, and a party requests a stay pending arbitration, § 3 of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.