(PC) Doss v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20252:24-cv-01092California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT L. DOSS, No. 2:24-cv-1092 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed March 14, 2025, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to file a second amended complaint may result in the dismissal of this action. (Id. at 8.) On March 31, 2025, plaintiff filed the notice of amendment form, but no second amended complaint. (ECF No. 15.) On April 9, 2025, plaintiff was informed of the omission, and he was granted an additional fourteen days in which to file the second amended complaint. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to file the proposed second amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 1.) On April 21, 2025, plaintiff filed a copy of his previously…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.