Steshenko

Steshenko v. Board of Trustees of Foothill-De Anza Community College District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20255:24-cv-06126California933 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO, Case No. 24-cv-06126-SVK (HSG)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW CONSENT

v. Re: Dkt. No. 28 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FOOTHILL-

DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

DISTRICT, et al.,

Defendants.

13 On April 8, 2025, Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen partially granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion for sanctions. Dkt. No. 24. Afterward, pro se Plaintiff Gregory Steshenko filed a document purporting to decline magistrate judge jurisdiction. See Dkt. No. 26. He then filed a motion to withdraw consent. Dkt. 28. Judge van Keulen referred Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw consent to this Court as the general duty judge for resolution. Dkt. No. 29. Since the referral, Plaintiff has filed additional documents seemingly in support of the motion to withdraw consent. Plaintiff filed a document styled as “objections” to Judge van Keulen’s April 8 order and a request for relief from the order under Civil L.R. 72-2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.