Sumana Forest Retreat v. County of San Diego, California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20253:24-cv-01196California5,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUMANA FOREST RETREAT, et al., Case No.: 24-cv-1196-RSH-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

COMPLAINT

Defendant. [ECF No. 23] 16 17 18 Before the Court is the County of San Diego’s (“the County’s”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 22, “SAC”). ECF No. 23. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court grants the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Plaintiffs’ Allegations The instant case arises from the County’s permitting and code enforcement actions taken in relation to property Plaintiffs intended for religious use. The SAC alleges as 27 28 follows. 1. The Valley Center Property Plaintiff William Chu is a professor of Buddhist studies and ordained Buddhist minister.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.