Leonides Enriquez v. City of Long Beach

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20252:23-cv-06464California6,763 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 LEONIDES ENRIQUEZ, Case № 2:23-cv-06464-ODW (AJRx)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

14 CITY OF LONG BEACH et al., JUDGMENT [62]

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Leonides Enriquez brings this action for alleged civil rights violations 19 against Defendants City of Long Beach (the “City”), Officer Hector Lizardo, Officer 20 Leighton Mays1, Officer Trevor Costin, and Officer Frank Nogales. (SAC.) 21 Defendants move for summary judgment on all causes of action. (Mot.) The Motion 22 is fully briefed. (See Opp’n, ECF No. 67; Reply, ECF No. 72.) For the reasons below, 23 the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion.2 24

26 1 Enriquez does not allege Lizardo’s or Mays’s first name. (Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), ECF No. 47.) The Court derives Lizardo’s and May’s first name from Defendants’ Motion for Summary 27 Judgment. (Mot. Summ. J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.