Crystal Adams-King v. Starbucks Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL
Case No. 2:25-cv-01493-MCS-AS Date May 2, 2025 Title Adams-King v. Starbucks Corp.
Present: The Honorable Mark C. Scarsi, United States District Judge
Stephen Montes Kerr —_———NotReported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND (ECF No. 13) AND STIPULATION TO STAY PENDING ARBITRATION (ECF No. 24) (JS-6) Defendant Starbucks Corporation removed this employment action by Plaintiff Crystal Adams-King from state court, invoking diversity jurisdiction. (Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1; Compl., ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff filed a motion to remand the case to state court, which 1s fully briefed. (Mot., ECF No. 13: Opp’n, ECF No. 19; Reply, ECF No. 21.) At the scheduling conference, the Court signaled it would deny the motion and ordered the parties to submit either a stipulation to stay pending arbitration or a motion to compel arbitration. …