Miguel A. Herrera v. Williams Scotsman, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20252:25-cv-01678California4,569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff commenced this putative class action in Los Angeles County Superior Court on February 14, 2023. (Complaint (Docket No. 1-1)). Plaintiff brought the matter against Mobile Mini only. (See generally id.). Defendants represent in the Opposition that Williams Scotsman, Inc. is the successor in interest to Mobile Mini Inc. (See, e.g., Opposition at 14). Plaintiff alleges that he was an hourly non-exempt ______________________________________________________________________________

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 25-01678-MWF (SPx) Date: May 5, 2025 Title: Miguel A. Herrera v. Williams Scotsman, Inc. et al. employee of Mobile Mini from “in or around September 2019 to November 17, 2022.” (Complaint ¶ 4).

Plaintiff brought several claims for Mobile Mini’s alleged failure to comply with California labor law, which were analyzed separately in Defendants’ Notice of Removal, filed February 26, 2025. (Docket No. 1).

First, Plaintiff brings a claim for Mobile Mini’s alleged failure to pay overtime wages in violation of California Labor Code sections 510 and 1194. (Complaint ¶¶ 37- 46). Defendants did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.