(PC) Houx v. Fresno County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20251:24-cv-00116California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VICTOR HOUX, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00116-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

v. IMPOSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

KEEP THE COURT APPRISED OF HIS

FRESNO COUNTY, CURRENT ADDRESS AND TO OBEY A

COURT ORDER

Defendant. (Doc. 7) 16 14-DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff Victor Houx (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following screening, this action proceeds on Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on January 25, 2024, against Defendant Fresno County for claims under Monell for failure-to-protect and failure-to-train. (Doc. 1). On March 14, 2025, the Court entered an order finding service appropriate and forwarded service documents to Plaintiff to complete and return within 30 days from the date of service of the order. (Doc. 7). Plaintiff was forewarned that “[a]ny failure … to comply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.