(PC) Tackett v. River City Drug Rehab

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN LEE TACKETT, No. 2:25-cv-0940 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND RIVER CITY DRUG REHAB, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On March 31, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS…