TSA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FROY DIAZ BRITO, Case No. 2:25-cv-1232-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

TSA, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff brings this action against multiple federal and county defendants, purporting to allege claims under Title 18 of the United States Code and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988, 42 U.S.C. 263a. The complaint’s allegations are frivolous and fail to state a claim. Accordingly, I recommend plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the…