Reynolds

United States v. Reynolds

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 202524-2132California2,354 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2132 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:18-cr-00158-JD-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAHRYL LAMONT REYNOLDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 3, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge PAEZ.

Dahryl Reynolds appeals the district court’s imposition at sentencing of a

standard condition of supervised release that instructed that he “must not associate,

communicate, or interact with” any person he knows has been convicted of a

felony, unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer (“felon

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. association ban”).1 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d), district court judges may

impose discretionary conditions of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.