Reynolds
United States v. Reynolds
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 6 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2132 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:18-cr-00158-JD-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
DAHRYL LAMONT REYNOLDS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 3, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge PAEZ.
Dahryl Reynolds appeals the district court’s imposition at sentencing of a
standard condition of supervised release that instructed that he “must not associate,
communicate, or interact with” any person he knows has been convicted of a
felony, unless granted permission to do so by the probation officer (“felon
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. association ban”).1 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d), district court judges may
impose discretionary conditions of…