Puckett

Puckett v. Agboli

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 202523-3009California1,051 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, No. 23-3009 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:14-cv-02776-DAD-DMC v. MEMORANDUM*

A. AGBOLI; LYNCH; DAYSON; LUIS;

ROMEO VALLAR; D. YAROCH; R.

BULAWIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 1, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett raised

various claims against medical staff at the California Medical Facility

(“Defendants”). The district court granted summary judgment to Defendants on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Puckett’s medical indifference and failure-to-protect claims, and dismissed

Puckett’s First Amendment retaliation claim at Prison…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.