Clifford Miller v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 202523-15256California448 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 6 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLIFFORD W. MILLER, No. 23-15256
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00673-MMD-CSD v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE MEMORANDUM*
OF NEVADA; et al.,
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 21, 2025 SD Carter & Keep U.S. Crthse
Before: WALLACE, McKEOWN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Clifford W. Miller appeals from the district court’s denial of his
petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
“We review the district court’s denial of habeas relief de novo.” Panah v.
Chappell, 935 F.3d 657, 663 (9th Cir. 2019). We affirm.
Miller asserts he received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), during…