Geng

facts: (1) he did not contribute any funds to the purchase of the property and has not paid the mortgage payments and property taxes (RFA Nos. 14, 27– 28); (2) he intended the property to be Wang’s separate property (RFA No. 22); (3) the property is generating rental income (RFA Nos. 25–26); and (4) he has not given any of the rental income he has collected to Wang since the inception of the case (RFA No. 29). The RFAs also included several requests relating to other properties.

3 notwithstanding the fact that all objections were waived by virtue of defendant’s failure to timely serve responses to the requests for admissions.” Geng filed a notice of appeal on February 20, 2024.

DISCUSSION

I.

APPEALABILITY

“The right to appeal is wholly statutory.” (Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior Court (2010) 51 Cal.4th 1, 5.) A reviewing court has jurisdiction only of an appeal from a judgment or order made expressly appealable by statute. (Griset v. Fair Political Practices Com. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 688, 696.) “Unless an order is expressly made appealable by a statute, this court has no jurisdiction to consider it.” (Levinson Arshonsky & Kurtz LLP v. Kim (2019) 35 Cal.App.5th…