eGumball

eGumball v. Merrick Bank Corp. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 2025G062863MCalifornia5,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 5/6/25 eGumball v. Merrick Bank Corp. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

EGUMBALL, INC.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G062863

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021-01216871)

MERRICK BANK CORPORATION, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING;

Defendant and Appellant. NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

It is ordered the opinion filed herein on April 23, 2025, be modified as follows: On page 6, delete the fifth sentence of the first paragraph beginning with “eGumball said” and insert in its place: eGumball told the defendants “there was not a single credit card transaction processed by eGumball in 2020 or 2021 that was not directly and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.