Almada
Almada v. Krieger Law Firm, A.P.C.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 JEFFREY A. ALMADA, on behalf of Case No.: 19-cv-2109-MMP himself and all others similarly situated 9 class members, ORDER GRANTING IN SUBSTANTIAL PART PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff,
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR THIRD
11 v. DISTRIBUTION FROM THE RESIDUAL COMMON FUND AND
KRIGER LAW FIRM, A.P.C.,
FINAL APPROVAL OF CY PRES
13 Defendant. BENEFICIARIES 14 [ECF No. 87] 15 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for a Third Distribution from the Residual Common Fund and Final Approval of Cy Pres Beneficiaries. ECF No. 87. No opposition was filed. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS IN SUBSTANTIAL PART Plaintiff’s motion. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND The Court described the background in detail in its May 16, 2024 Order. ECF No. 86. In 2019, Plaintiff filed a putative class action against the Kriger Law Firm, A.P.C. 24 25 1 Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c) provides “Waiver: If…