(SS) Ochoa v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20251:19-cv-01686California838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 RAFAEL BARRAGAN OCHOA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01686-JDP (SS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 LELAND DUDEK, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff’s counsel seeks an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). ECF No. 25. Plaintiff entered into a contingent fee agreement providing that he would pay counsel twenty- five percent of any award of past-due benefits. ECF No. 25-2 at 1-2. After this court remanded for further proceedings, plaintiff was found disabled and awarded $112,063.00 in past-due benefits. ECF No. 25-1 at 2. Plaintiff’s counsel requests $27,979.40 in attorney fees, which is approximately the statutory maximum, and which equates to an effective hourly rate of $662.23. An attorney is entitled to reasonable fees for successfully representing social security claimants in district court. 26 27 1 Although the motion for fees was filed under plaintiff’s name, plaintiff’s counsel is the real party in interest. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.