Quick

(PC) Torres v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20251:22-cv-01536California1,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-KES-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY v.

(ECF No. 80) JAYSON QUICK, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Edward Torres (Plaintiff) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint arises from events that took place in March and April of 2019 while he was confined at the Madera County Jail. (ECF No. 1). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to his requests for the production of documents. For the reasons given below, Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery is denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on January 30, 2022. (ECF No. 1). After screening Plaintiff’s complaint, this Court found that the case should proceed on Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment claims for excessive force and failure to protect against Defendants Quick,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.