Angela Standlee v. Abbott Laboratories

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20252:24-cv-09586California2,173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELA STANDLEE, Case No. 2:24-cv-09586-FLA (MAAx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND AND

DENYING REQUEST FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES [DKT. 20]

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al., Defendants.

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Before the court is Plaintiff Angela Standlee’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Remand to the Los Angeles County Superior Court (“Motion”). Dkt. 20 (“Mot.”); Dkt. 20-1 (“Mot. Br.”). Defendants Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”) and St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. (“SJMSC”) (together, “Corporate Defendants”) oppose the Motion. Dkt. 22 (“Opp’n”). Defendant Tony Li (“Li”) did not respond to the Motion. On January 8, 2025, the court found the Motion appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for January 10, 2025. Dkt. 29; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Local …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.