Foster

Foster v. Board of Trustees of the California State University

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20253:24-cv-01917California3,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BJ FOSTER and ADAM ELLIS, Case No.: 24cv1917-LL-SBC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. AMEND COMPLAINT

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE [ECF No. 16]

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,

ET AL.,

16 Defendants 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint. ECF No. 16 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Defendants filed an Opposition [ECF No. 17 (“Opposition”) and Plaintiffs filed a Reply [ECF No. 18 (“Reply”)]. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND On August 24, 2024, Plaintiffs BJ Foster and Adam Ellis filed a Complaint in San Diego Superior Court against the Board of Trustees of the California State University, Jennifer Milo, Todd Sneeden, and Andrea Leonard in their individual and official 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.