Phill J. Williams v. 1819 S Gramercy LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. CV 25-02583-DMG (ADSx) Date May 2, 2025 Title Phill J. Williams v. 1819 S Gramercy LLC, et al. Page 1 of 1 Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEREK DAVIS NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER OF REMAND Pro se Plaintiff Phill J. Williams initiated this case by filing a notice of appeal from a Second District California Court of Appeal order affirming a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [Doc. # 1.] He also subsequently filed a one-page notice of removal that states he seeks removal from final judgment of the Second District California Court of Appeal, but no judgment or order is attached. [Doc. # 7.] “The Rooker–Feldman doctrine instructs that federal district courts are without jurisdiction to hear direct appeals from the judgments of state courts.” Cooper v. Ramos, 704 F.3d 772, 777 (9th Cir. 2012). …