Sharde

Sharde v. Contra Costa District Attorney

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20254:24-cv-07177California876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RONISHA SHARDE, Case No. 24-cv-07177-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 32 VIVIANNA BECERRA, et al., Defendants.

12 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Ronisha Sharde’s second amended complaint, Dkt. No. 32. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s prior complaint and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. 2, but granted Plaintiff an opportunity to amend. See Dkt. No. 31 (“Order”) at 3. The Court again DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. The Court previously denied Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis motion after finding that her prior complaint failed to state any plausible claim. Order at 3. The complaint alleged that the California Attorney General’s office and several of its staff members, individuals working for the Contra Costa County District Attorney, Meta, and private individuals committed cyberstalking, harassment, identity theft, and mail fraud against Plaintiff.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.