Hannonen
Hannonen v. McCloskey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEENA HANNONEN, an individual; Case No.: 3:24-CV-02408-BEN-BLM AGNES BRADSHAW, an individual,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS v. PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
MARK McCLOSKEY, an individual; 15 TIMOTHY M. RYAN, an individual; ANDREW J. MASE, an individual; MATTHEW H. AGUIRRE, an individual; 17 THE RYAN LAW FIRM, APC, a California Professional Corporation; and
DOES 5-25,
19 Defendant.
21 Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) 22 filed by Defendants Mark McCloskey, Timothy M. Ryan, Andrew J. Mase, Matthew H. 23 Aguirre, and The Ryan Firm, APC (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to Federal Rule 24 of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Court has considered the Motion (ECF No. 13), 25 Plaintiffs’ Opposition (ECF No. 14), Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 16), and the record in 26 this case. For the reasons set forth, the Motion is GRANTED, and the FAC is
DISMISSED.
28 I. BACKGROUND This…