Hannonen

Hannonen v. McCloskey

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20253:24-cv-02408California2,375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEENA HANNONEN, an individual; Case No.: 3:24-CV-02408-BEN-BLM AGNES BRADSHAW, an individual,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS v. PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

MARK McCLOSKEY, an individual; 15 TIMOTHY M. RYAN, an individual; ANDREW J. MASE, an individual; MATTHEW H. AGUIRRE, an individual; 17 THE RYAN LAW FIRM, APC, a California Professional Corporation; and

DOES 5-25,

19 Defendant.

21 Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) 22 filed by Defendants Mark McCloskey, Timothy M. Ryan, Andrew J. Mase, Matthew H. 23 Aguirre, and The Ryan Firm, APC (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to Federal Rule 24 of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Court has considered the Motion (ECF No. 13), 25 Plaintiffs’ Opposition (ECF No. 14), Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 16), and the record in 26 this case. For the reasons set forth, the Motion is GRANTED, and the FAC is

DISMISSED.

28 I. BACKGROUND This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.