Raterman-Doidge
Raterman-Doidge v. City of Fresno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARY RATERMAN-DOIDGE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00654-JLT-SKO
Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING AND
GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
WITHDRAW ADMISSIONS v. (Doc. 16)
CITY OF FRESNO,
12 Defendant. 13 _____________________________________/
14 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Mary Raterman-Doidge’s motion to withdraw admissions that occurred by operation of law when she failed to serve timely responses to Defendant City of Fresno’s Requests for Admissions, filed April 8, 2025 (the “Motion”). (Doc. 16.) The parties filed a joint statement directed to the Motion (the “Joint Statement”), as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on April 30, 2025. (Doc. 18.) The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Statement and finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for May 14, 2025, will be vacated. Having considered the Joint Statement, and for the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted.…