Fossum

Fossum v. Lamm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20251:24-cv-01374California415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY SCOTT FOSSUM, Case No. 1:24-cv-01374-JLT-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING v. CASE 13 BRIAN LAMM, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Timothy Scott Fossum, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this action on November 8, 2025. (Doc. 1.) On November 15, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint, found that it failed to state a claim, and gave Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 7.) On December 6, 2025, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (Doc. 10.) On January 13, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge screened the amended complaint, again found that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and gave Plaintiff another thirty days to file a second amended complaint. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by the deadline, and the assigned magistrate judge issued an order directing Plaintiff to show…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.