Ricocol

David Reinaldo Zamora v. Ricocol

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20255:25-cv-00568California332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID REINALDO ZAMORA, Case No. 5:25-cv-00568-KK-KES

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

v.

RECOMMENDATION OF U.S.

RICOCOL, Warden, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Respondent.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the

other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 5). No objections to the Report and

Recommendation were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed.

The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate

Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the

Petition with prejudice because it fails to state a non-frivolous claim for federal

habeas relief.

As a federal prisoner proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner is not

28 required to obtain a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in order to appeal to the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.