Ricocol
David Reinaldo Zamora v. Ricocol
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20255:25-cv-00568California332 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID REINALDO ZAMORA, Case No. 5:25-cv-00568-KK-KES
Petitioner,
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
v.
RECOMMENDATION OF U.S.
RICOCOL, Warden, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Respondent.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the
other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 5). No objections to the Report and
Recommendation were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed.
The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate
Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the
Petition with prejudice because it fails to state a non-frivolous claim for federal
habeas relief.
As a federal prisoner proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner is not
28 required to obtain a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in order to appeal to the …