Villalobos

(PC) Valencia v. Villalobos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20251:25-cv-00097California895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC VALENCIA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00097-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUESTS FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF

v. (Doc. No. 14) VILLALOBOS and SGT. B. MENDOZA,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Eric Valencia is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(21)(A), (B), on February 6, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, assessed the full $350.00 filing fee, directed officials to pay an initial filing fee of $32.00 based on the six-month deposits into Plaintiff’s inmate trust fund account, and to pay 20% of any future income deposited into Plaintiff’s inmate account until the full $350.00 filing was paid. (Doc. No. 6). Plaintiff proceeds on his Complaint on his First Amendment retaliation claim against Officer Villalobos and supervisory liability claim against Sgt. Mendoza. (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.