(PC) Mundy v. City and County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20252:23-cv-00059California772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY W. MUNDY, No. 2:23-cv-0059 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CITY AND COUNTY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Four matters are before the court. 1. Dismissal of Defendants Kroner and Holt On October 22, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to complete and return to the court the USM- 285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants Kroner and Holt. Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in those defendants being dismissed. Time has expired for plaintiff to provide the necessary forms. Accordingly, the court will recommend that they be dismissed. In a motion filed February 7, 2025, plaintiff asks that the court order that the U.S. Marshal serve process on Kroner at a law firm that represented her in Tandel v. County of Sacramento, 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.