(PC) Mundy v. City and County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY W. MUNDY, No. 2:23-cv-0059 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CITY AND COUNTY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Four matters are before the court. 1. Dismissal of Defendants Kroner and Holt On October 22, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to complete and return to the court the USM- 285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants Kroner and Holt. Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in those defendants being dismissed. Time has expired for plaintiff to provide the necessary forms. Accordingly, the court will recommend that they be dismissed. In a motion filed February 7, 2025, plaintiff asks that the court order that the U.S. Marshal serve process on Kroner at a law firm that represented her in Tandel v. County of Sacramento, 26 …