(PC) Lewis v. CDCR CSP SAC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN LEWIS, JR., Case No. 2:24-cv-3001-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CDCR CSP SAC, et al., Defendants. 16 On March 3, 2025, I granted plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint and ordered him to file an amended complaint within thirty days. ECF No. 6. To date, plaintiff has not filed any response. The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.”). A court may dismiss an action based on a party’s failure to prosecute an action, failure to obey a court order, or failure to comply with local rules. See Henderson v.…