Kearns
Kearns v. Liberty Insurance Corporation
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 7 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRAD KEARNS; ELIZABETH KEARNS, No. 24-2945 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 3:24-cv-00060-MMD-CSD v.
MEMORANDUM*
LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 31, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge KOH.
In this diversity action, Brad and Elizabeth Kearns (“Plaintiffs”) assert that
their insurer, Liberty Insurance Corporation, breached a homeowner’s insurance
policy (the “Policy”) by refusing to pay more than twelve months of loss-of-use
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). coverage after a tree fell on the Plaintiffs’ residence in Stateline, Nevada.…