Berryhill

Williams v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20253:18-cv-02678California1,278 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MADELINE W., Case No.: 18-cv-02678-AJB-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY’S FEES

FRANK BISIGNANO,1 Acting (Doc. No. 28) Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

Before the Court is a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) filed by Denise Bourgeois Haley, counsel for Plaintiff Madeline W. (“Plaintiff”). (Doc. No. 28.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion for attorney’s fees. I. BACKGROUND On November 6, 2018, Plaintiff signed a contingency fee agreement retaining Haley and the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to represent Plaintiff in connection with her

Frank Bisignano became Acting Commissioner of Social Security on May 6, 2025, and is automatically substituted as Defendant in this case pursuant to Rule 25(d)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.