Gilmore
Gilmore v. Safe Box Logistics, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANICE GILMORE, Case No. 21-cv-06917-AMO
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING SECOND
AMENDED MOTION FOR APPROVAL
v. OF PAGA SETTLEMENT AND
MOTION FOR AWARD OF
SAFE BOX LOGISTICS, INC., et al., ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND
REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS,
Defendants. SUBJECT TO RESUBMISSION Re: Dkt. Nos. 157, 158
13 This is a proposed wage and hour class and representative action in which Plaintiff Janice Gilmore again seeks approval of a settlement covering only claims under the California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Second Amended Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement (“Mot.”) (ECF 158) at 7. Further, Gilmore seeks an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of costs. ECF 157. The motion for settlement approval is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for May 15, 2025, is VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b), Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 78(b). The Court assumes…