Sepulveda

Sepulveda v. Alomari

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20253:23-cv-01443California5,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 23-cv-01443-TSH

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT; GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL

MOJEEB AHMED ALOMARI, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 60,

13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Richard Sepulveda is an individual with a disability. He brings this case against Defendants Mojeeb Ahmed Alomari and Adel M. Aldafari, both individually and dba Mi Ranchito Market, and Mi Ranchito Market #2, alleging claims under the American with Disabilities Act and related state law claims stemming from barriers he encountered at Mi Ranchito Market. Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 60)1 and Sepulveda’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 62)). The Court finds these motions suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the May 15, 2025 hearing. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.