Krause

Krause v. Krause

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20251:21-cv-01706California582 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Michael Krause, No. 1:21-cv-01706-KJM-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Tara Krause, 1S Defendant. 16 Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is before the court. Mot., ECF No. 112. Plaintiff 18 seeks reconsideration of the prior district judge’s adoption of the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. Adoption Order, ECF No. 109. Defendant filed a response, which this court 20 construes as an opposition, to plaintiff's motion. Response, ECF No. 116. For the following reasons and for the reasons explained in this court’s previous order granting attorneys’ fees, ECF No. 122, plaintiffs motion for reconsideration is denied. Local Rule 230(j) governs motions for reconsideration. In pertinent part, a party seeking 24 reconsideration must: “‘set[ ] forth the material facts and circumstances surrounding [the] motion 25 ...including: what new or different facts or circumstances…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.