Gladwin

Gladwin v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20253:25-cv-03370California1,833 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDREW GLADWIN, Case No. 25-cv-03370-LJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

AND MOTION SHOULD NOT BE

JOHN DOE, DENIED Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 16,

A. Introduction Plaintiff Andrew Gladwin, a United Kingdom citizen who sells instructional materials related to stage magic, alleges that Defendant John Doe purchased some of those materials from him and wrongfully copied and resold them. See generally Am. Comp. (ECF No. 16). Gladwin seeks leave to serve an early subpoena on Comcast to determine Doe’s identity based on the IP address that Doe used to purchase products from Gladwin. ECF No. 17. The Court previously ordered Gladwin to show cause why his attorney Adam H. Rose, who is not a member of this Court’s bar, should not be disqualified from representing him. ECF No. 9. Gladwin has now retained local counsel and the Court has granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.