Justin

Justin v. Trump Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20255:25-cv-03787California1,005 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MALIK JUSTIN, Case No. 25-cv-03787-LJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE

DONALD TRUMP JR., DENIED AND COMPLAINT SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED

Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1,

I. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

14 Pro se Plaintiff Malik Justin applied to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. Justin 15 responded “No” to every question that he answered on his application form, indicating that he has 16 no assets or income of any kind. Justin failed to complete question 1 and did not respond to 17 questions 8 through 10. Id. at 2, 3-4. Justin’s application is therefore incomplete, and taken as a 18 whole, it does not include sufficient information to determine whether the answers that he actually 19 provided are credible. Justin is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his application to 20 proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied, by filing a response no later than May 28, 2025 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.