Justin
Justin v. Trump Jr.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MALIK JUSTIN, Case No. 25-cv-03787-LJC
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE
DONALD TRUMP JR., DENIED AND COMPLAINT SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED
Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1,
I. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
14 Pro se Plaintiff Malik Justin applied to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. Justin 15 responded “No” to every question that he answered on his application form, indicating that he has 16 no assets or income of any kind. Justin failed to complete question 1 and did not respond to 17 questions 8 through 10. Id. at 2, 3-4. Justin’s application is therefore incomplete, and taken as a 18 whole, it does not include sufficient information to determine whether the answers that he actually 19 provided are credible. Justin is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his application to 20 proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied, by filing a response no later than May 28, 2025 21…