Justin

Justin v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20253:25-cv-03788California984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MALIK M. JUSTIN, Case No. 25-cv-03788-LJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE

JAYCEON TERRELL TAYLOR, DENIED AND COMPLAINT SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED

Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1,

12 A. Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Plaintiff Malik Justin, pro se, has applied to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. Justin responded either “No” or “N/A” to every question that he answered on his application form, indicating that he has no assets or income of any kind. Justin did not respond to questions 8 and 9, inquiring about his expenses, debts, and related cases. Id. at 3. Justin’s application is therefore incomplete, and taken as a whole, it does not include sufficient information to determine whether the answers that he actually provided are credible. Justin is therefore ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his application to proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.