Justin
Justin v. Taylor
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MALIK M. JUSTIN, Case No. 25-cv-03788-LJC 8 Plaintiff, AMENDED1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPLICATION TO v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED AND
JAYCEON TERRELL TAYLOR, COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 1,
13 A. Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Plaintiff Malik Justin, pro se, has applied to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. Justin responded either “No” or “N/A” to every question that he answered on his application form, indicating that he has no assets or income of any kind. Justin did not respond to questions 8 and 9, inquiring about his expenses, debts, and related cases. Id. at 3. Justin’s application is therefore incomplete, and taken as a whole, it does not include sufficient information to determine whether the answers that he actually provided…