Justin

Justin v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20253:25-cv-03788California1,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MALIK M. JUSTIN, Case No. 25-cv-03788-LJC 8 Plaintiff, AMENDED1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPLICATION TO v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED AND

JAYCEON TERRELL TAYLOR, COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 1,

13 A. Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Plaintiff Malik Justin, pro se, has applied to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. Justin responded either “No” or “N/A” to every question that he answered on his application form, indicating that he has no assets or income of any kind. Justin did not respond to questions 8 and 9, inquiring about his expenses, debts, and related cases. Id. at 3. Justin’s application is therefore incomplete, and taken as a whole, it does not include sufficient information to determine whether the answers that he actually provided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.