MMT City View Properties, LLC v. Orange Grove Ventures, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20252:25-cv-01920California2,988 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MMT CITY VIEW PROPERTIES, Case No. 2:25-cv-01920-WLH-SK LLC,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Plaintiff, TO REMAND [16]

v.

ORANGE GROVE VENTURES, LLC;

and DOES 1-50,

Defendants.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (the “Motion”). (Mot., Docket No. 16). No party filed a written request for oral argument stating that an attorney with five years or less of experience would be arguing the matter. (See Standing Order, Docket No. 8 at 16). Further, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for May 16, 2025, is VACATED, and the matter taken off calendar. For the reasons explained herein, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion and ORDERS the case be remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court. 28 I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff MMT City View Properties, LLC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.