Rose
Sylabs, Inc. v. Rose
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SYLABS, INC., Case No. 23-cv-00849-SVK
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER
AND COUNTERCLAIMS
GREGORY ROSE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 121 Defendants.
This case involves Plaintiff Sylabs, Inc.’s (“Sylabs”) allegations that Defendants accessed, destroyed or otherwise misappropriated Sylabs’ trade secrets. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File their First Amended Answer and Counterclaims. Dkt. 121 (the “Motion”). As previously explained, all necessary Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. See Dkt. 90 at 1. The Court has determined that the Motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). After considering the Parties’ briefing, the relevant law and the record in this action, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ request. Defendants have leave to file the proposed amended answer at Dkt. 121-1. I. BACKGROUND …