Campbell

(PC) Harper v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20251:24-cv-01549California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL HARPER, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-01549 JLT EPG ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO v. ) PAY THE FILING FEE ) TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) )

The Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee after finding he was not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter. (Doc. 18.) The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to pay the required filing fee as ordered would result in dismissal of this action. (Id. at 3.) More than 30 days have passed, and Plaintiff failed to pay the required filing fee. Without such payment, the action cannot proceed before the Court. See Saddozai v. Davis, 35 F.4th 705, 709 (9th Cir. 2022). In finding dismissal is appropriate, the Court has considered the factors outlined by the Ninth Circuit for terminating sanctions, including: “(1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.