Smith v. Chase Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, ) Case No.: 1:25-cv-0330 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CHASE BANK, et al., ) THE CASE ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 4) ) 16 Candace Smith seeks to hold several financial institutions—including Chase Bank, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Golden I Credit Union—as well as credit reporting companies liable for violations of her civil rights and a “stolen legacy.” (Doc. 1 at 1, 4.) Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. 4.) The magistrate judge observed that Plaintiff indicated the basis of the Court’s jurisdiction was “federal question,” including “[i]ntentional setups by corrupt group,” violation of her “civil rights” and “stolen legacy.” (Doc. 4 at…