Frank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL ARMENTA, No. 2:24-cv-2075-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND ROBERT FRANK, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 1, 2025, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and determined for screening purposes that the complaint stated a claim. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was ordered to complete documents and return them to the court for the purpose of serving the defendant. (Id.) The time granted has expired, and plaintiff has not complied with the order or otherwise responded to the court. Moreover, it appears plaintiff’s address of record is no longer correct.1 “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets” and, in exercising that power, may impose sanctions, including dismissal of an action. Thompson v. Housing Auth., City

1 Plaintiff’s address of…