Nestle USA, Inc. v. Bear Label Machine, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20252:24-cv-03399California2,292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NESTLE USA, INC. No. 2:24-cv-03399-DC-AC Plaintiff, v. SCHEDULING ORDER BEAR LABEL MACHINE, INC., Defendant. 16 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court reviewed the parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 11) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). I. SERVICE OF PROCESS The named defendant has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS The parties do not presently anticipate the joinder of additional parties or amendment of the pleadings. Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.